Tuesday, August 29, 2017

Rise of the cephalopod

                                                    By © Hans Hillewaert, CC BY-SA 4.0,                                                                                    
A recently study published in Current Biology, looked at current trends in cephalopod abundance. They state that Cephalopod populations are extremely variable, can fluctuate wildly and are currently experiencing a boom in numbers.  Squid, cuttlefish and octopuses have a long history of being able to adapt rapidly to changing environments.

Researchers investigated long-term trends in abundance using a global time-series of catch rates. The study revealed cephalopod populations have increased over the last six decades and were unusually consistent across taxa. Study datasets spanned the last 61 years (1953 to 2013). Results show increases of 52% squid, 31% octopuses, 17% cuttlefish and sepiolids populations. One explanation could be due to elevated water temperatures due to ocean warming. This is thought to accelerate the life cycle of cephalopods when thermal ranges are not exceeded and food remains abundant.

To read the complete study [which is open access], follow the link here [and above]

References:

Doubleday, ZoĆ« A. et al., 2016. Global proliferation of cephalopods. Current Biology, Volume 26, Issue 10 R406 - R407. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.04.002


Image credit: By © Hans Hillewaert, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=385705 

Friday, August 25, 2017

Human/polar bear conflict study

                            Alan Wilson - www.naturespicsonline.com

Living in Florida, we often see human/animal conflicts with black bear and alligators. Western states also have to contend with grizzly bears. These attacks are well documented and studied. Conversely, polar bear attacks on humans are rare. Researchers state that concern for a rise in polar bear conflicts is warranted due to predictions of increasing numbers of nutritionally stressed bears spending more time hunting [closer to human populations]. One cause of this is loss of sea ice habitat.

The study done by Wilder, et. al., 2017 [Polar bear attacks on humans: Implications of a changing climate], published in the Wildlife Society Bulletin, found that “from 1870–2014, we documented 73 attacks by wild polar bears, distributed among the 5 polar bear Range States (Canada, Greenland, Norway, Russia, and United States), which resulted in 20 human fatalities and 63 human injuries” (Wilder, et. al., 2017). They also noted that attacks were mainly from stressed male bears looking for food. Attacks by females were rare and were in defense of their cubs.

Increases in human/wildlife conflicts result in negative public perceptions, which usually result in a negative outcome for the animals involved. Management goals are to educate and develop methods for coexistence. Before this study, there was no systematic data collected on polar bear conflicts.  Folklore and incomplete data help fuel the anxiety over polar bear encounters.

The study, which is very detailed and gives information about all recorded attacks, characteristics of attacking bears, bear behavior and seasonality of attacks, and the role of humans in these attacks, can be found from the reference below.

FAU library users can look up the article through Searchwise here.

References:

Wilder, J. M., Vongraven, D., Atwood, T., Hansen, B., Jessen, A., Kochnev, A., York, G., Vallender, R., Hedman, D. and Gibbons, M. (2017), Polar bear attacks on humans: Implications of a changing climate. Wildl. Soc. Bull.. doi:10.1002/wsb.783


Image credit: By Alan Wilson - www.naturespicsonline.com: [1], CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=38456823

Tuesday, August 22, 2017

The Applied Ecologist Blog

As a library, it is our job to share resources with faculty and students. Here is one that anyone interested in conservation and ecology may find interesting.

The Applied Ecologist blog is the official blog for Journal of Applied Ecology, “this is a place for authors to promote their research through written posts, podcasts, videos and images. We also hope it will be a place for authors, readers, practitioners and policymakers to discuss anything relating to the interface between ecological science and the management of biological resources”. You can sign up to get email alerts when they add new blog posts. 

A recent post, Poaching problems? More rangers, please… takes a closer look at the difficulties rangers face trying to protect endangered species within protected areas. They stated that over 1,000 rangers have died in the line of duty protecting wildlife.
Image:  
Ranger patrol (Image: Jennifer Moore / Wildlife Conservation Society - Rwanda Program)


To read the whole blog post and article published in the Journal of Applied Ecology, follow the links above and here:



Information on the Wildlife Conservation Society can be found here and specifically their Rwanda Program here.

Tuesday, July 25, 2017

Rhythm is gonna get you


















A recent article published in Current Biology (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.035), shows that Northern elephant seals have the ability to memorize the rhythm and timbre of other seals. The ability to perceive rhythmic sound is thought to be rare in mammals other than humans. The documented cases are a result of behavioral training.

Mathevon, et. al., 2017,  state that “In the northern elephant seal Mirounga angustirostris, the calls of mature males comprise a rhythmic series of pulses, with the call of each individual characterized by its tempo and timbre; these individual vocal signatures are stable over years and across contexts”. Their research shows that elephant seals use this information to identify individual rivals. 

To read the entire study:

Nicolas Mathevon, Caroline Casey, Colleen Reichmuth, Isabelle Charrier, Northern Elephant Seals Memorize the Rhythm and Timbre of Their Rivals’ Voices, Current Biology, Available online 20 July 2017, ISSN 0960-9822, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.035.


Image: By original image by Jan Roletto, uploaded 18:58, Feb 26, 2004 - de:Wikipedia by de:User:Baldhur, edited by Matthew Field - National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (http://www.noaa.gov), Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=3440642

Keywords: rhythm perception; metrical patterns; rhythm; timbre; individual vocal recognition; mammal; rival assessment


Friday, June 2, 2017

Looking at ex situ Amphibian programs

Amphibian populations are in trouble. According to the Amphibian survival Alliance (amphibians.org) entire species are being driven to extinction by threats that include loss of habitat, disease, contamination and climate change. At least one third of all Amphibians are classified as threatened (Hoffman, et. al, 2010; Biega, et. al, 2017). Conservation initiatives are needed to reverse this trend. Biega, et. al. examined “the extent to which zoos house species representing the greatest overall conservation priority by testing how eight variables relating to extinction risk – International Union for the Conservation of Nature status, habitat specialization, obligate stream breeding, geographic range size, body size and island, high-altitude and tropical endemism – vary between amphibian species held in zoos and their close relatives not held in zoos” (Biega, et. al. page 113).

You can read methods and results from this study published in Animal Conservation, Vol 20, Issue 2 [Full citation below].

To summarize the article briefly, researchers found that zoos and other ex situ programs as a whole are not targeting the high risk amphibian species. If range-restricted habitat specialist species are not a focus, populations will continue to decline without a safety net. Researchers suggest that zoos increase their conservation-focused amphibian species holdings.

Reference:
Biega, A., Greenberg, D.A., Mooers, A.O., Jones, O.R., Martin, T.E., 2017. Global representation of threatened amphibians ex situ is bolstered by non-traditional institutions, but gaps remain. Animal Conservation. Volume 20, Issue 2. Pages 113–119. DOI: 10.1111/acv.12297 

Hoffman, M., Hilton-Taylor, C., Angulo, A., Bohm, M., Brooks, T.M., Butchart, S.H., Carpenter, K.E., et al. (2010).The impact of conservation on the World’s vertebrates. Science 330, 1503–1509.


Image credit: Amphibians.org